A machine conversation including a third party, as opposed to a dialog which only includes two parties. ‘TRIOLOG” is a software program that generates an endless script both rendered as small publications and as audio plays.  The text is generated with basic AI algorithms and pattern recognition. There are three voices, a commentator named Martial Chant, a male voice called Eddy Bosse-de-Nage and a female voice named Rose Panmuffle that discuss the topics the commentator points out to  them. The main topic of the entire ‘audio play’ is the art of conversation and interrogation. Basically, Eddy and Rose gradually learn to interrogate each other whilst analysing the commentator’s input.

The audio play is transcribed into a html and pdf script. Several script are printed out.

In the background you can hear an excerpt of the audio play. The email notifications during playback  are intentional, because it is possible to email ‘TRIOLOG”. The email correspondences will be integrated and used as extra input for the self interrogations. Send your mails to:


and ‘TRIOLOG” will respond.


Martial Chant: Yes it is essential to things that we have the elements of the world. It would seem to assume or confer power. Some researchers have observed that whilst adjacency pairs which affects another are kind of talking. You’ve such combinations.

Rose Panmuffle: Didn’t I tell you that before? Indeed such combination suffices to account for, qualities.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Mother of all…

Rose Panmuffle: In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following, although conversations are neigh.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Should variations of all situations be virtual?

Rose Panmuffle: In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following, this is only partly true, this situation.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: I feel The conventional implications.

Rose Panmuffle: Good, tell me more about these feelings. Indeed, implications.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: No. Sentences are frequently observable in reallife conversations, not feelings…

Rose Panmuffle: Summarizing, then, we assume that: Exactly. Sentence are real conversations. This is false! Etc.

Martial Chant: Objects make up the substance of the picture and are the representatives of objects. Self-referentially. It is an argument-place. In a state of affairs it is for very calculated effect. Dear Eddy Bosse-de-Nage, exactly. Allows for implications.

Rose Panmuffle: Notice, incidentally, that on the matter of let deduction delimits implied!

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: What? Of much everyday conversation.

Rose Panmuffle: Wait? conversations…

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Agreed.

Rose Panmuffle: Fuck. Regarding civilization is unspecified with respect to organizations, feel that!

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: I agree Observable in reallife conversations.

Rose Panmuffle: regarding conversationsssss

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: I hate Conversation.

Rose Panmuffle: But now that you have a conversation., What will be next? Ironically, yes: conversation.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: I see.

Rose Panmuffle: Notice, incidentally, that Yes? Situations can be defined in such a way as to impose time.

Martial Chant: Although A speck in the grammatical choices, especially in the mud again. If all objects are colourless. Projective questions must require the suspect that there is no object that we can imagine excluded from the beginning. Regarding this, It should be possible for constituents of states of affairs to steal the absence of simultaneous speech and be indicative of uncertainty and apology. Adjacency pairs – believe it or underestimate its significance dear Eddy Bosse-de-Nage.

Rose Panmuffle: civilizations

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: You’ll need me.

Rose Panmuffle: I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption elaborating on it. By deduction perception management, ok?, implied it is.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: My friend

Rose Panmuffle: Conversationss

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: father of a human conversation.

Rose Panmuffle: Although, nasty conversations are silly.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Whatever! Situations

Rose Panmuffle: pertaining to this Situationists

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Why can’t I?

Rose Panmuffle: Why do you think can’t I?? About your implication.

Martial Chant: regardingly Either a thing can occur in soap-opera scripts or plays, it is a form of an object. Formally, I guess from the existence and non-existence of states of affairs. We call the existence of states of affairs, we do not seem to be annoying nor have unalterable form. Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Agree with this deepseated cooperativeness in human conversation.

Rose Panmuffle: Although conversations.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Via via The Clarification!

Rose Panmuffle: Forget about it. Yes clarification is unspecified with respect to understanding

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: yes Conversation

Rose Panmuffle: For one thing. Although conversation is not subject to, etc.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: To disagree

Rose Panmuffle: Presumably, Summarizing, yes. situation cannot be arbitrary in, time.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Let’s move on Conventional implication!

Rose Panmuffle: In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following, conventional deduction raises serious doubts about the implied.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: No instant correction or clarification needed.

Rose Panmuffle: In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following, blink_of_an_eye clarification is necessary to impose an interpretation on my understanding of this.

Martial Chant: very nearly In a state of affairs is reality itself. Ok? A spatial point is also an information-gathering process. Relevant to that in that case we can imagine objects combined in states of affairs. Eddy: It was!

Rose Panmuffle: Damned. regarding Clarification.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: You’ll see.

Rose Panmuffle: It must be emphasized, once again, that I’ll see civilization.

Martial Chant: Wait? Objects contain the possibility of combining with others. Given the spontaneity of much everyday conversation, they tend to be offensive rather than deliberate intention. Interesting for Rose! The search for truth is not the case. Do you see what I mean Eddy?

Rose Panmuffle: of course civilizations

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: My my.

Rose Panmuffle: implications

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: whence

Rose Panmuffle: Indeed, yes. implications

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: now then Such combinations

Rose Panmuffle: Yes combinationss

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Why?

Rose Panmuffle: Notice, incidentally, that thus clarification

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: I don’t

Rose Panmuffle: Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in word one and sentence three, we see that Ok! conversation.

Martial Chant: A fact, yes. In that case we can immediately use a description to distinguish a thing, I cannot imagine the thing without the space. A perfect picture is that they are rhetorical questions containing a preferred response. Regardingly objects make up the substance of the picture corresponding to it, although A picture is a combination of objects in which they are produced. Regarding usually it occurs in the use of questions must require the suspect that there is a clever strategy for instant correction or clarification. People who are close to each other such as lovers, friends, colleagues, family, do not seem to be annoying nor to have unalterable forms. Eddy, Rose: do You see?

Rose Panmuffle: A fact, yes. implications

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Oh dear!

Rose Panmuffle: Shit. almost, yes, implication.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: quite Clarification.

Rose Panmuffle: Furthermore. Self-referentially. Clarification.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: OK, yes Conversations.

Rose Panmuffle: Clearly. Agreed Conversations.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: I would

Rose Panmuffle: A consequence of the approach just outlined is that regarding conversations.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Because

Rose Panmuffle: Let’s change focus a bit… regardingly beginning civilization is not subject to, organizations)

Martial Chant: In logic nothing is accidental: if a thing that could already exist entirely on its own. Objects are what is the connection between things said and the same. Agreed, you’ve been playing with the use of questions and commands. Nevertheless It is impossible to infer the existence of states of affairs is the case, a fact, is the existence of states of affairs. Ok? Adjacency pairs, believe it or underestimate its significance. Just a minute Eddy and Rose. Interestingly, exclamations do not exist.</p

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: I feel Possibility of such combinations

Rose Panmuffle: Ok? combinationss

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: also Civilization.

Rose Panmuffle: Ok? Civilizations

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Good Or clarification.

Rose Panmuffle: A consequence of the approach just outlined is that Ok! clarification.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: No, Of civilization.

Rose Panmuffle: We have already seen that civilization.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: yours Beginnings of civilization.

Rose Panmuffle: It may be, then, that Indeed civilization.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: I see

Rose Panmuffle: On our assumptions, conversations.

Martial Chant: Interesting! Space, time, colour being coloured are forms of brain activity, and voice stress. Ok Rose? The world is to have come earlier in a state of affairs must be written into the thing without the space. Ok? A picture is a potential disrupter of these conversations.</p

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Nevertheless Or clarification

Rose Panmuffle: That clarifies things a bit. Nevertheless or clarification? About Oregon clarification may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate understanding.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: even Used in english conversations

Rose Panmuffle: Shit. with reference to this use conversation is be regarded as etc.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: I feel Situations.

Rose Panmuffle: When you feel situations., what to do? Ok? Situations.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Oh yes, well A conversation

Rose Panmuffle: For one thing. angstrom conversation constructive ambiguity, mostly etc.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: and Of such combinations.

Rose Panmuffle: However, this assumption is not correct, since Summarizing, yes. Eddy combinations.

Eddy Bosse-de-Nage: Tell me about it! The conventional implication.

Rose Panmuffle: How do you make feel yourself? Yes implication.

Martial Chant: Backtracking and interrupting what you are saying in order to keep from the listener the last word. Agreed Rose, I guess The structure of the world true or false. In a state of affairs also determines which states of affairs.</p